CXPACKET, MAXDOP and your OLTP system

So you are experiencing CXPACKET wait types? If you run a google search, you will quickly find out you are experiencing the dreaded SQL Server parallelism problem and you must reduce MAXDOP to 1. While that is possible, I say most likely not. I say that, most of the time, SQL is doing the best it can with what it has to work with. That is the query, the data and the schema.

Microsoft has come a long way since version <= 7.0 when it comes to parallelism. If your OLTP queries follow best practices and are well indexed, they probably will never generate a parallel plan. This is because they are fast and access a small amount of rows. If they are missing indexes or SQL overestimates cardinality, SQL might decide to do scans, sorts, hashes, spools etc. These iterators, among others, can go parallel to reduce execution time at the cost of system resources. These iterators are not bad and they do have their place. It just isn’t on OLTP type of queries most of the time.

So dropping the MAXDOP on an OLTP system to 1 probably won’t hurt much because most of the time there is an IO bottleneck. If the CXPACKET wait types are a symptoms of poor indexing and row count estimation, it won’t help either. Whole books have been written on indexing, query tuning and there is a nice whitepaper on stats best practices to avoid estimation problems so I am not going to go into that. I will give you some pointers on quickly identifying whether the CXPACKET is a symptom or the cause.

So your boss and boss's boss run over to your desk yelling about the customer complaints of slowness with SQL. You run this query or something similar:

select r.cpu_time 

, r.logical_reads

, r.session_id 

into #temp

from sys.dm_exec_sessions as s 

inner join sys.dm_exec_requests as r 

on s.session_id =r.session_id --and s.last_request_start_time=r.start_time

where is_user_process = 1 

 

waitfor delay '00:00:01'

 

select substring(h.text, (r.statement_start_offset/2)+1 , ((case r.statement_end_offset when -1 

then datalength(h.text)  else r.statement_end_offset end - r.statement_start_offset)/2) + 1) as text

, r.cpu_time-t.cpu_time as CPUDiff 

, r.logical_reads-t.logical_reads as ReadDiff

, p.query_plan

, r.wait_type

, r.wait_time

, r.last_wait_type

, r.wait_resource

, r.command

, r.database_id

, r.blocking_session_id

, r.granted_query_memory

, r.session_id

, r.reads

, r.writes

, r.row_count

, s.[host_name]

, s.program_name

, s.login_name

from sys.dm_exec_sessions as s 

inner join sys.dm_exec_requests as r 

on s.session_id =r.session_id and s.last_request_start_time=r.start_time

full outer join #temp as t on t.session_id=s.session_id

CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(r.sql_handle) h

cross apply sys.dm_exec_query_plan(r.plan_handle) p

order by 3 desc

 

drop table #temp

You notice that you have several rows with CXPACKET wait types. With this query, you click the xml show plan link and:
1.    search the xml for missing indexes.
2.    Save as a .sqlplan and reopen in SSMS
3.    Compare estimated and actual rows in the iterators on the right side of the plan. Poor estimates may bubble to the left as well.
4.    If there are no missing indexes, estimates and actual are fairly close, reducing MAXDOP may help if it is not a huge report or query.

5. If there are missing index or bad estimations, fix it! :)

Of course, these are not rules set in stone. Just a style in the art of database administration. Just don't blame it on a "parallelism bug" because it is a poor musician that blames his instrument.

One thing to note, if you do turn down MAXDOP server-wide, turn in on at the query level(enterprise edition) on your index operation because they are optimized for it.
Alter index all on tblBlah rebuild with (maxdop=32);

email it! |   |   |   |  | 

Permalink     3 Comments  

Rate this Post: 12345
COMMENTS:

I understand all the advice about statistics and estimated vs actual reads, but I'm confused about your query with the ReadDiff and CPUDiff on the same session. What's the theory behind that?

posted @ Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:53 PM by Sideout

---

The readdiff and CPUDiff really don't matter in the context of this conversation. That is just the query I use to see what is going on right now.

I take a snapshot, wait a second and then do a diff because the CPU and IO columns are cumulative so the session with the highest number is not necessarily the one pegging out the system right now. The diff allows me to see that.

posted @ Friday, June 27, 2008 9:35 AM by Jason

---

Do you have simular codes for sql 2000?

posted @ Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:14 PM by Ann Han

---

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Simple BBCode can be used like [URL]...[/URL] and [B]